Search for: "Bark v. Bark"
Results 1 - 20
of 614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 10:32 am
As Howard has already noted, Barkes follows on the heels of the Court’s recent qualified-immunity decision in San Francisco v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
" Jacobs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
In the case of Grau v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:24 am
That's the holding of the Second Circuit in a case arising from a dog that was barking its head off.The case is Burg v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Regina (SO) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (The Children’s Society intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 634 1101; [2010] WLR (D) 257 “Local authorities enjoyed, by virtue of s 23C(4)(c) of the Children Act 1989, the power to accommodate a person who had formerly been a child in care and was therefore a former ‘relevant child’ within s 23A of the Act, and a local authority was not entitled, when considering whether the welfare of a former ‘relevant… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
“BARK IF YOU’RE DIRTY” ENABLED ASSAULT AND SEXUAL HARASSMENTIn late September, the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:26 am
Regina (Ethos Recycling Ltd) v Barking and Dagenham Magistrates’ Court [2009] EWHC 2885 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 331 "The term 'summary proceedings'  in s 79 (10) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 did not include the service of a notice of abatement under s 80 of the Act. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
If Barking and Dagenham are considering amending their tenancy agreements to add clauses regarding informing on others, they should have Wandsworth’s fate in LB Wandsworth v Maggott 2013 in mind. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Senator Tillis tells Becerra not to fall for march-in rights petitions; the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:12 pm
This week in Other Barks & Bites: a series of bills introduced into Congress aim to improve prospects for minority inventors, eliminate compulsory copyright licenses in broadcast TV and reduce patent challenges against generic drugmakers; the Federal Circuit decides that there is no functionality in the aesthetic appeal of a design patent; FBI Director Wray testifies on about 1,000 IP theft probes pointing back to Chinese entities; France is the first EU country to adopt the Copyright… [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 pm
Third, there is a wolf that didn’t bark: Manafort did not include a challenge to the Special Counsel’s appointment under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, as a means to overturn Morrison v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 10:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Trump Administration sues Gilead for infringement over HIVE PrEP treatment patents; Senators Inhofe and Wicker ask President Trump to show no leniency on Chinese IP theft; the Supreme Court hears the Allen v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 11:33 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation's petition to the Supreme Court in a case against Apple; AAG Makan Delrahim's remarks about misuse of antitrust law by U.S. courts; Eli Lilly's petition to the Supreme Court regarding functional claiming rule; cert granted in Allen v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
Janus v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 10:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit remands a “frustrating” patent case proceeding on an “impermissible theory of liability;” the Supreme Court questions counsel on the industry effects of copyright protections for software interfaces during oral arguments in Oracle v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 2:08 pm
Schiller v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 1:03 pm
Schiller v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:15 am
Sanofi and Abitron Austria v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:15 am
Sanofi and Abitron Austria v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Ninth Circuit holds that public policy arguments cannot overturn claims to monetary damages stemming from a French copyright proceeding; the Ninth Circuit also affirmed that the discovery rule still applies to copyright claims despite the application of laches to the Copyright Act’s statute of limitations in Petrella v. [read post]
