Search for: "Barker v. People" Results 101 - 120 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 7:15 am by Eric Turkewitz
They were the best of blogs; they were the worst of blogs… Today we see a face-off: It’s the American Bar Association v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 2:40 am by SHG
Justifying his decision to file the motion, Fleischman cited the 1972 case Barker v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
Here is my submission to the INDU Committee conducting the s.92 review of the Copyright Act. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
Birmingham City Council v Barker (Equal Pay Act : Other establishments) (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0056_10_0905 (9 May 2011) Latest appeal judgment in mass equal pay litigation against Birmingham City Council. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada A top city official in Guelph, Ontario has filed a $500,000 defamation lawsuit against Gerry Barker, who runs a local political blog known as Guelph Speaks. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
And the correct test to determine whether that has occurred, the state insists, is the one that the lower court applied in this case: the “speedy trial” test outlined in Barker v. [read post]