Search for: "Barnard v. Barnard" Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2015, 1:32 pm by Dan Ernst
  Several months before her passing, she signed onto the amicus brief filed by Historians of Marriage and the Family and the American Historical Association and cited in the majority opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:20 pm by Kim Krawiec
By now most readers will have seen the article in Friday’s New York Times discussing Kamakahi v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:21 pm
At any rate, assuming the existence of a duty to disclose, both the general standard for materiality and the specialized probability/magnitude balancing under Basic v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Goldmark graduated from Bryn Mawr College in 1898 and then taught for a while at Barnard College. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm by Lisa Kriegler
While the English position has varied throughout the years, South African courts have consistently relied on the foreseeability of the harm suffered  when considering claims for psychiatric injury (see Barnard v Santam Bpk and Dawkins v Administrator, Transvaal for example). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:19 am
” Other decisions in which a public employee's right to free speech was considered include Tytor v Laramie County School District, CA10 [unpublished]; Jeffries v Harleston, CA2, 52 F3d 9; and Barnard v Jackson County, CA8, 43 F3d 1218. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm by Florian Mueller
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:45 am
Umberto Fernandez, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenant's Life Partner Considered Non-Traditional Family Member, Entitled to Succession Rights Barnard College v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:04 am
Supreme Court" in Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
” Although the current law permitted such actions, Justice Barnard urged the state legislature to address this inequity in the relation back doctrine. [read post]