Search for: "Barnard v. Barnard" Results 101 - 120 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm by JD Hull
See the DSM-IV-TR (or the newer DSM-V) and traits from other sources to see what they are, and see how you and your friends rate. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Nature of Exemplary Damages and the Recommendation Exemplary damages are a special category of damages which is designed to punish the defendant and to vindicate the strength of the law (see Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 at 1221). [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by David Nagode
In essence, the French legislator was aware that technical regulations, which could potentially place additional burdens on importers from other Member States according to the dual burden doctrine (Barnard, p. 87). [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Barber, Bryant Barchet, Alison Barker, Michele Barnard, Pat Barnes, Ruthlyn M. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The four who were on the negotiating team outside of AUCC (and presumably AUCC counsel) were: David Barnard (University of Manitoba), Elizabeth Cannon (University of Calgary), Patrick Deane (McMaster University), and Tim McTiernan (University of Ontario Institute of Technology). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]