Search for: "Barnes and Noble, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
Amazon sued Barnes and Noble for its “Express Lane,” which also allowed customers to check out with one click. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:18 am
Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android- and Chrome-Based DevicesApril 30, 2012: Barnes & Noble and Microsoft Form Strategic Partnership to Advance World-Class Digital Reading Experiences for Consumers" ("Barnes & Noble and Microsoft have settled their patent litigation, and moving forward, Barnes & Noble and Newco will have a royalty-bearing license under Microsoft's patents for its NOOK eReader and Tablet products.") [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The closing of Borders will leave Barnes & Noble as the only remaining national bookstore. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
" Thought, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
E Ink Holdings is another Taiwanese electronics manufacturer that develops eReader screens for devices like Barnes & Noble’s Nook and Amazon’s Kindle. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:00 pm
” Unitrin, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:07 am
Barnes & Noble The WSJ is reporting (sub required) that Barnes & Noble will release an eBook reader called the Nook. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 7:27 am
You may remember Amazon's lawsuit against Barnes and Noble over the one-click purchasing technology; that patent was U.S. 5,960,411, which recently survived reexamination. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
While negotiations are still fluid, the settlement is expected to eliminate Apple’s so-called “most favored nation” status, which had prevented the publishers from selling lower-priced e-books through rival retailers such as Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) or Barnes & Noble Inc (BKS.N), the people said. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
No injuries have been reported.Sold At:Online at Amazon.com and other websites and at Barnes & Noble and specialty stores nationwide from February 2022 through August 2023 for about $17.Distributor(s):Fisher Price Inc., of East Aurora, New YorkManufactured In:IndonesiaRecall number:24-010# # #This is why you should always stay away from the troublesome.# # #PRESS RELEASE [read post]
10 May 2017, 11:31 am
The lawsuit against Barnes and Noble was settled in 2002 with undisclosed terms. [read post]
10 May 2017, 11:31 am
The lawsuit against Barnes and Noble was settled in 2002 with undisclosed terms. [read post]
10 May 2017, 11:31 am
The lawsuit against Barnes and Noble was settled in 2002 with undisclosed terms. [read post]
10 May 2017, 11:31 am
The lawsuit against Barnes and Noble was settled in 2002 with undisclosed terms. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:26 pm
Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android- and Chrome-Based DevicesApril 30, 2012: Barnes & Noble and Microsoft Form Strategic Partnership to Advance World-Class Digital Reading Experiences for Consumers" ("Barnes & Noble and Microsoft have settled their patent litigation, and moving forward, Barnes & Noble and Newco will have a royalty-bearing license under Microsoft's patents for its NOOK eReader and Tablet products.") [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
Seminal business/management books are few and far between, although you'd never guess that walking into your typical Barnes & Noble and knee-capping yourself over the inevitable piled-high/piled-deep table displaying the combined wit and wisdom of wannabe guru's. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 11:57 am
Barnes & Noble, Inc., Civ. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
Barnes & Noble Inc., 763 F.3d 1171, 1175 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting First Options of Chi., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:07 pm
Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android- and Chrome-Based DevicesApril 30, 2012: Barnes & Noble and Microsoft Form Strategic Partnership to Advance World-Class Digital Reading Experiences for Consumers" ("Barnes & Noble and Microsoft have settled their patent litigation, and moving forward, Barnes & Noble and Newco will have a royalty-bearing license under Microsoft's patents for its NOOK eReader and Tablet products.") [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:55 am
” Finally, the ALJ found that Barnes & Noble failed to specifically indentify new information or theories in Microsoft’s late supplementation of its contention interrogatory that prejudiced Barnes & Noble in any significant way. [read post]
