Search for: "Barnes v. Frank"
Results 61 - 80
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Frank R. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
Fisher, The Continuity of Morton Horwitz PART I LEGAL HISTORY AND MORTON HORWITZ 1 Frank I. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:35 pm
See Barnes v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
Frank T. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
Barnes and Noble is offering it for just under $31 if you pre-order now. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am
” Robert Barnes at the Washington Post recaps yesterday’s decision in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
Robert Barnes writes, "Killer Frank Spisak, not his attorney, brought on death penalty, justices rule," for today's Washington Post. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:50 pm
" Video Link The People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
Also at Volokh, Orin Kerr takes a look back at Frank v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
Following the recent grant of cert. in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
In Munaf v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
BARNES, J., concurs. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:34 pm
So, here goes: In Spivey, Judge Frank Easterbrook broke from all other circuits to have addressed the question and held that 28 U.S.C. [read post]
