Search for: "Barnes v. House" Results 181 - 200 of 477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2016, 8:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
On December 11, 2014, Perschbacher applied to the county for a CUP to construct on the land a barn capable of housing 2,490 swine. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
The court only noted in passing that Lilly and its main expert sought to rely on apparent “in-house test data” that does not appear to have been in the public realm at the time of filing (para. 51). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:02 am by Patricia Salkin
Arkay, LLC v City of Charleston, 2016 WL 3573147 (SC App. 6/29/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception [read post]
13 May 2016, 12:48 pm
He explained that he had first stayed there one night in May 2014, but the housing issues were not rectified. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am by MBettman
Barnes, 2002-Ohio-68 (An alleged error is plain error only if the error is obvious.) [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm by Old Fox
To escape the sickness, Cranmer left the town with two of his pupils—brothers who were related to him through their mother—and went to their father’s house at Waltham in Essex. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
This case arose out of Huff’s efforts to renovate a house and two barns on the Property, which he claims were thwarted by twelve defendants: his neighbors Edward and Sally Ward; the Township of Harding; the Harding Township Committee; the individual members of the Harding Township Committee (Edward Ward, Marshall Bartlett, Louis Lanzerotti, Regina Egea, James Rybka, and Nicholas Platt); the township engineer Paul Fox. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm by Giles Peaker
  Interviews will be held at the Barnes office in south west London. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am by Ted Brooks
More and more law firms are likely to at least experiment with in-house presentation staff. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 In doing so, the House and Senate tipped their hats to Buddha’s fundamental Law of Impermanence, the precept that, over time, stuff happens. [read post]