Search for: "Barnes v. House"
Results 161 - 180
of 477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
In Clapper v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 5:31 am
The style of the case is Nassar v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:25 am
” The keeper of a livery stable or barn who houses horses at a certain monthly rate per stall but does not feed or care for the horses are still entitled to this lien. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 2:16 pm
Further, in Dostoyevsky's The House of the Dead and Poor Folk, 180 Constance Garnett, trans., (Barns and Noble Classics 2004), we read: "It is useless to punish a sick man. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:36 am
Klinger v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
In May, the White House Report on Big Data recognized opportunities and concerns about data collection. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:51 am
Once again, the Jackson bill will thankfully die in the House. [read post]
28 May 2007, 10:47 am
The case on point that immediately comes to mind is Barnes v Glen Theater, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:10 pm
In Sandford v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:56 pm
Jerry Barnes, one of funk’s great unknown bass guitarists. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
- This post shares the procedures behind USPTO’s new rules implementing post-grant review (PGR), inter partes review (IPR) and transitional business methods post-grant review (TBMP) proceedings. 4) Patently O: Prior User Rights Defense – This post outlines Dennis Crouch’s testimony before the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet, and how the primary focus of his testimony was… [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
- This post shares the procedures behind USPTO’s new rules implementing post-grant review (PGR), inter partes review (IPR) and transitional business methods post-grant review (TBMP) proceedings. 4) Patently O: Prior User Rights Defense – This post outlines Dennis Crouch’s testimony before the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet, and how the primary focus of his testimony was… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:54 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:56 am
Laws banning truthful business speech about lawful conduct should trip First Amendment review [Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Seeberger v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:49 am
It’s a shame the state that hosted Tennessee v. [read post]
