Search for: "Barnes v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2022, 9:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
” Last week, the Fifth Circuit released a real barn-burner of an opinion in the matter of NetChoice v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:00 pm by Jason Mazzone
In other words, if you don’t want Congress limiting social security survivor benefits to heterosexual couples, then you shouldn’t have Congress running social security in the first place. [read post]
To remind us that legislators may appeal to their own moral convictions and to claims about social utility to reshape the law as they think it should be in the future. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, in which the justices will consider social-security-benefits claimants’ ability to scrutinize the data on which benefits denials are based. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Bush administration in lawsuits over terrorism policies and interrogation of detainees. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
In Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment; McLane v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, in which the justices considered social security benefits claimants’ ability to scrutinize the data on which benefits denials are based. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Venkat
Hummingbird Speedway" "Judge Offers to Facebook 'Friend' Witnesses in Order to Resolve Discovery Dispute -- Barnes v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Karen Barnes fell when taking off her shoes before going through airport security, allegedly because of the negligence of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in not providing her a chair. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Barnes, First Circuit: Appellant pled guilty to distribution and conspiracy to distribute 50kg of marijuana. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
”  Finally, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post notes “unmistakable comparisons to the court’s action on the Social Security Act of 1935” (which the Court upheld in a pair of cases in 1937). [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:51 pm
  Without comment, the Justices declined to hear an appeal by a Cincinnati woman whose identity was stolen after a county court clerk posted her Social Security number and other identifying information on an Internet website. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, that a 25 percent cap in the Social Security Act on the award of attorney’s fees applies only to fees for representing a client in court, and not to aggregate fees for both court representation and representation before the agency. [read post]