Search for: "Barnes v. State of Ohio"
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
On January 8, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
On February 4, 2020, by a vote of 4-3, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed as improvidently accepted State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
On February 8, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 12:31 pm
Barnes, 2008 Ohio 5602, 2008 Ohio App. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
Barnes, 2002-Ohio-68 (An alleged error is plain error only if the error is obvious.) [read post]
28 May 2007, 10:47 am
The case on point that immediately comes to mind is Barnes v Glen Theater, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Husted v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:06 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:52 pm
Another example of the wide berth given to non-scientific expert testimony under Daubert is United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Barnes and Figueroa v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
In what might be a surprising decision in any other Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in Barnes v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:19 pm
State v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
”The Ohio Supreme Court in Koprivec v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 8:36 am
Instead, Wyckoff stated that Powlette represented that the barn was agriculturally exempt, and that MCBRD had no duty to inspect the barn unless a permit was issued for its construction pursuant to the Ohio Building Code. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
”The Ohio Supreme Court in Koprivec v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:10 pm
Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 (1977). [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:43 pm
Ohio 2007); Taylor v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 6:14 am
Barnes v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
On May 16, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Don Koprivec et al. v. [read post]
