Search for: "Barnes v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm by Lucas Guttentag
A web of other proclamations and restrictions leave open many avenues for other travelers to enter the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that “[u]nder the new policy, immigrants would be suspect if they are in the United States legally and use public benefits — such as Medicaid, food stamps or housing assistance — too often or are deemed likely to someday rely on them. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
But only if one can put it into practice before the horses are out of the barn,and therein lies a policy (and political) dilemma. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 5:49 pm by Charnovitz
United States) cites numerous prior customs court and appellate decisions. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolfe reports that the court “appeared likely to side with the Trump administration in its effort to end a program that lets nearly 700,000 young, undocumented immigrants live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
United States and “clarify that acquitted conduct sentencing is unjust and unconstitutional. [read post]