Search for: "Barnett, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am by tracey
The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) so held in allowing an appeal by the defendant, Ian Stanley Barnett, against a confiscation order made by Judge Hernandez in the Crown Court at Manchester on 2 February 2011 on the basis of an assessment that the defendant’s financial benefit from his general criminal conduct was £5,085,22·70 and substituting the figure of £873,010.” WLR Daily, 21st December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk   [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:02 pm
Barnett (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted The Misconceived Assumption About Constitutional Assumptions on SSRN. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:18 am
Barnett v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Court of Appeal “Where full planning permission had been granted for the construction of buildings, the grant approved the application plans and drawings unless the permission expressly stated otherwise. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:25 am by Lawrence Solum
Barnett (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Whence Comes Section One? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:08 am by jlucivero
  The Guilty Plea Problem After Philip and Nathan Barnett were convicted of murder in 2008, they appealed the decision. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit will hear an appeal to one of those rulings this week in Atlanta.In less than two years, Barnett, 59, has accomplished what few law professors ever manage to do: make an arcane constitutional argument so compelling and clear that it becomes part of the national conversation.But what makes Barnett unique is how his influence has extended beyond the elite circle of litigators fighting the health care law and into the grass… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:06 pm
Very many congratulations to Daniel Barnett who has raised more than his target of £10,000 for the Starlight Charity in less than two weeks through his Employment Law Bulletin. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Barnett (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Deep-State Constitutionalism (Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2022, at 33, reviewing Common Good Constitutionalism, by Adrian Vermeule. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:31 pm
The May issue of Barnett's Notes on Commercial Litigation will come out tomorrow. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:08 pm by Howard Wasserman
Barnett is a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:38 am by Glenn Reynolds
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit will hear an appeal to one of those rulings this week in Atlanta. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:32 pm
Thomas Barnett, the Justice Department’s antitrust chief, expressed concern earlier this week over the EU’s Court of First Instance decision dismissing Microsoft’s appeal of a landmark 2004 decision by the EU and upholding nearly $700 million in fines. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:48 am by JB
(Remember that even if a claim ultimately loses on appeal, this does not mean that it is frivolous.)What is frivolous today may become plausible tomorrow, if enough people get behind the argument. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:35 am by Lawrence Solum
Barnett (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Whence Comes Section One? [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by Legal Profession Prof
We conclude that the appropriate sanction for Barnett’s misconduct is disbarment.... [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 11:15 am
Yesterday, the Arizona Supreme Court rejected the appeal of Roger Barnett who was found liable by a jury after assaulting a family of Latino U.S. citizens while they were hunting on state land in southern Arizona. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Ralph Barnett, 55, Indianapolis, is a free man after the Indiana Supreme Court declined to reconsider the Appeals Court's opinion, which overturned his conviction in May. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:07 am by Orin Kerr
“Randy has advanced his theories from something widely dismissed to something that must be taken very seriously,’’ said Eugene Volokh, a professor at UCLA School of Law who once clerked for Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.Thanks to How Appealing for the link. [read post]