Search for: "Barnett v Schwartz"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2008, 3:44 am
Barnett v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 4:52 am
Today's Outside Counsel Column in the New York Law Journal features our discussion of Barnett v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
The Second Department recently wrote on this issue in Barnett v Schwartz ,2007 NY Slip Op 09712 ,Decided on December 11, 2007 ,Appellate Division, Second Department ,Ritter, J., J "The plaintiffs are entitled to an award of prejudgment interest. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:07 am
We've written in the past about the difference between "the" proximate cause and "a" proximate cause, see: Barnett v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:41 am
Barnett v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Defendants in legal malpractice are eager to flaunt this requirement, and argue that the legal malpractice must be the "sole" cause of the injury.The Second Department now clarifies in Barnett v Schwartz ,2007 NY Slip Op 09712 ,Decided on December 11, 2007 ,Appellate Division, Second Department ,Ritter, J., J "The defendants' argument concerning causation has an impact upon the analysis of other issues raised. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
Unpaid interns are the big subject of the day in today’s Top 10, as Todd Leibowitz and Dan Schwartz both weigh in on a big case. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Barnett v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:44 am
However, "'CPLR 5001 operates to permit an award of prejudgment interest from the date of the accrual of the malpractice action in actions seeking damages for attorney malpractice'" (Barnett v Schwartz, 47 AD3d 197, 208 [2007], quoting Horstmann v Nicholas J. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm
Perez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm
The case in common is Barnett v Schwartz ;2007 NY Slip Op 09712 [47 AD3d 197] . [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
Further, as to the second prong, the plaintiff must plead and prove actual, ascertainable damages as a result of an attorney's negligence (see Barnett v Schwartz, 47 AD3d 197, 211). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
The case in common is Barnett v Schwartz ;2007 NY Slip Op 09712 [47 AD3d 197] . [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am
An attorney is liable in a malpractice action if the plaintiff can prove that the attorney failed to exercise the skill commonly exercised by an ordinary member of the legal community and that such negligence was the proximate cause of damages (see Rudolph v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corten & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; Barnett v Schwartz, 47 AD3d 197, 203; Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC v Comprehensive Mental… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:54 am
But, then, what of Barnett v. [read post]
Unconstitutional to Consider Husband’s Refusal to Give Religious Divorce (Get) When Granting Support
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Pinto, 260 A.D.2d 622 (2d Dept. 1999); Schwartz v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Barnett v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:55 am
But, then, what of Barnett v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
