Search for: "Barnett v. State of Oregon"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2014, 10:10 am
Garcia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
CareFlite Accessing an Employee’s Facebook Posts by “Shoulder Surfing” a Coworker’s Page States Privacy Claim — Ehling v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
District Court for Oregon issued a 122-page opinion, styled Oregon Firearms Federation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Barnett, Scrutiny Land, 106 Mich. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 8:53 am
Oregon passed a law saying that everyone—and this is in the 1920s—that everyone in the state of Oregon, every student, had to attend a public school and could not attend a parochial or private school. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:03 am
In one of these cases—Pierce v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm
United States (which I discussed here), the Supreme Court yesterday decided to hear another Takings Clause case: Sheetz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Similarly, in Pierce, he rejected Oregon’s requirement of attending public schools as treating children as “mere creatures of the state” to be “standardized” by the government in forming ideal citizens. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Oregon (1908) White Court: Buchanan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Oregon (1908) White Court: Buchanan v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
However, some states, such as Oregon, have passed laws that provide greater protection for religious exercise than required by the federal Constitution. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
And the United States Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, this Court, and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Delgado, 692 P.2d 610, 614 (Or. 1984) (striking down total ban on carrying switchblade knives); Barnett v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:15 pm
Cathy Brenston Symetra v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
Barnette (1943), the first of which affirmed an injunction that protected non-plaintiffs in a case concerning municipal law and the second of which did the same in a case concerning state law. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
For example, conspirator Randy Barnett has argued the former while Professor Kurt Lash, has, in good faith, argued otherwise. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
