Search for: "Barnett v. Superintendent"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm
For example, the regulatory reform law essentially reversed the Supreme Court case Watters v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:38 am
Last week the court accomplished just that in State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:29 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Upon receipt, the superintendent convenes a review committee, which then has 60 days to review the challenged materials and submit a report to the superintendent. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Upon receipt, the superintendent convenes a review committee, which then has 60 days to review the challenged materials and submit a report to the superintendent. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
Barnette (319 U.S. 624). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Supreme Court -- The relevant clearly established federal law is standard for ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland, which requires a showing of “both deficient performance by counsel and prejudice” JEFF PREMO, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Petitioner v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12, 26/03/2012. [read post]
