Search for: "Barr v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2010, 5:26 am
Panowicz of Panowicz Law Offices in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, for bringing this decision to my attention.Anyone desiring a copy of this unpublished, non-precedential decision by the Superior Court in Rosiecki may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:54 am
Click here to view the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in Sehl v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
Two weeks after Superior Court Judge Helen Toor upheld Barre resident _____'s appeal of the city's controversial "Child Safety Ordinance," Lauzon said he plans to urge city councilors to let Toor's ruling stand. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Spitsin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/thomas_foley/1SAVE THE DATE: Please be reminded that Superior Court Judge David N. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 3:06 pm
WechtPennsylvania Superior Court It is hoped that Judge Wecht will be able to comment on his recent decision in the case of Cordez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 11:05 am
After the jump is FN 8 of Kavanaugh's plurality in Barr v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
In the case of Corey v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Champi v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:10 am
In a December 29, 2009 decision in the case of EDB v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently ruled in Roth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:19 am
(Opinion by Mundy, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court addressed a case involving attorney’s fees awarded after a peer review process. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Corey v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:05 am
In the case of Bowman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:27 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal, in R v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
The trial court agreed with Barr. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
The trial court agreed with Barr. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:52 pm
Barr, a case that centers on the “stop-time rule,” the same provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act examined by the court in Pereira v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:20 am
[Judge Stephanos Bibas "does not see how" he can follow the plurality opinion] One of the most theoretically important and underappreciated Supreme Court decisions of 2020 was Barr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
