Search for: "Barrel v. Transportation Company"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2012, 6:55 am
The Trans Mountain Pipeline can transport approximately 300,000 barrels of oil per day and can transport different products in batches rather than being limited to transporting one product type at a time. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Executives do not have the use of a company vehicle or cash allowance for transportation and they may not use the company aircraft for personal use. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
In Snead v John Carlo, Inc., No. 298575, the Court of Appeals considered an appeal by the Michigan Department of Transportation (“MDOT”) from a trial court’s order for partial summary judgment on behalf of the plaintiff. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Religion, Arms, and ResistanceJonathan Mayhew, A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers: With Some Reflections on the Resistance Made to King Charles I and on the Anniversary of his DeathSimeon Howard, A Sermon Preached to the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company in BostonC. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
There, cops had planted an electronic beeper in barrels that they suspected were being used to transport cocaine. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
It is clear President Obama is committed to weaning America off Middle Eastern oil, securing our own energy future and recognizes the role natural gas can play as a domestic transportation fuel. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
It was a victory for car companies that wanted regulatory certainty; for consumers who will pay less at the pump; for our security, as we save 1.8 billion barrels of oil; and for the environment as we reduce pollution. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The 10 spills ranged in size from 2.5 barrels to 4,500 barrels and most were caused by pipeline corrosion. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:34 pm
In total over 19,000 personnel from BP, other companies and government agencies are currently involved in the response to the incident. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The administrative order signed by the company requires it to follow a schedule of clean up agreed to by EPA and the company. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:28 am
In his ensuing lawsuit, Brown claimed that the boat's owner, Reinauer Transportation Company (which was also his employer) was negligent in that the ladder was unsafe. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
; Boston.com; Connecticut Employment BlogMartin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
However, in 1995 the Ninth Amendment to the Brazilian Constitution was passed to include the possibility that any company other than an oil company controlled by the Brazilian Government may participate in the execution of the activities exclusively carried out by PETROBRAS up to that year. [18] As a consequence, as of such date, PETROBRAS lost its monopoly of the oil industry in Brazil. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Exxon Mobil claims that he violated company policy in leaving the bridge of the Exxon Valdez before she went aground on Bligh Reef, spilling 11 million gallons (about 258,000 barrels) of oil. [read post]
