Search for: "Barren v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2011, 3:50 pm
The rule from that case has been adopted into the law across the United States, and it is now the basis for section 351 of the Restatement (2d) of Contracts. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:34 pm
Supreme Court’s infamous 5–4 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:44 pm
Barren soil there. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
. ~~~ The State: New York The Case: In re: Ferrel L. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 4:37 pm
State of Washington DOT. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:52 am
Much of the new statutory law is not different than what has evolved as judicially written law since the 1990 case, Gruber v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
Probably the most famous case is Truax v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:34 pm
Of course, none of that would have been necessary had not exactly two years prior, on this day in 2006, the Washington State Supreme Court handed down a shockingly backwards decision in Andersen v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:48 pm
State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
The federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act basically says that the state can't burden religious practices for people in an "institution" -- e.g., a prison. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:48 am
Cavel v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 9:15 am
See Varnum v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:37 pm
New London, of course, was the epicenter of the public use case that became Kelo v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
Oct. 16, 2008) as well as the resulting state law decisions of Florida: Home Devco/Tivoli Isles LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:45 am
It can't be true. * Pine Barrens. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:10 pm
State. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
For those (like me) who were terribly disappointed in the wiggly, intellectually barren and doctrinally bankrupts decision in D.C. v. [read post]
