Search for: "Barrett"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 4:49 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also asked how the Idaho law would impact a woman in this scenario. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Would doctors who make the decision to perform an abortion, Barrett asked, be prosecuted under Idaho law? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:38 am
Australian Federal Police Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett said investigators found no evidence of specific targets or timing of an intended “violent act. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
The unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, found “[n]othing in constitutional text, history or precedent supports exempting legislatures from ordinary takings rules. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm
She assured Barrett that public urination and defecation would not violate the Eighth Amendment under the challengers’ theory. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
Barrett, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were appointed by Trump. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
So, for example, Justice Barrett’s lovely opinion for the unanimous Court in Lindke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
According to Barrett, textualists would find an “outsider” approach normatively superior because courts should be faithful agents of the people, who do not usually have inside knowledge of Congress. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
According to Barrett, textualists would find an “outsider” approach normatively superior because courts should be faithful agents of the people, who do not usually have inside knowledge of Congress. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
S. ___ (2021) (BARRETT, J., concurring in denial of application for injunctive rel [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence, which was joined by Justice Barrett, speaks clearly to this second issue. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
Two of the three are very recent appointments to the Court, and one (Barrett) doesn’t have much of a track record on administrative law issues. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
” (Cites to In re Facebook, Barrett v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
[Justice Thomas: “constitutional rights are generally invoked defensively in cases arising under other sources of law, or asserted offensively pursuant to an independent cause of action designed for that purpose”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
With the possible exception of Justice Barrett, the conservatives were skeptical of what they call a broad reading of a criminal law and apparently want to narrow it by deploying a canon that sounds in purposivism, while the liberals seemed to take the opposite view. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:58 pm
I suspect that Kavanaugh and Barrett do not agree on the MQD, as Barrett's Biden v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett suggested that even if the court were to reject the government’s broad interpretation, Section 1512(c)(2) might still apply to Fisher. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:39 am
However, this 34-page decision included concurrences by Justices Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
