Search for: "Barrett Co. v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] In our view, the phrase "Officers of the United States" does not refer to the President. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
Today, my co-counsel and I filed an amicus brief on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman in support of the Petitioner. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
[Five Responses to the Jefferson Davis Horrible] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” The court finally denied review on Nov. 20 in six-time relist E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 8:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
United States could be good news. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
II,§ 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The event was co-sponsored by the Stanford Center for Racial Justice and the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
Bulova Watch Co., 344 U.S. 280 (1952). [read post]
