Search for: "Barrett v. People" Results 41 - 60 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Joy
But She Had a Bar Exam to Finish.Group charged in kidnap plot discussed targeting Virginia governor, FBI agent says240,000 people apply for new COVID-19 benefit on 1st day despite technical glitchesJustice Department sues Melania Trump tell-all book author Amid the Barrett Hearing Choreography, a Near-Certain Outcome: ConfirmationSupreme Court grants Trump administration's request to halt census count while appeal plays outAmy Cooper, white woman charged in racist NYC run-in,… [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:22 am by Marcia Coyle
Senate Judiciary Committee members pressed Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett on whether the landmark abortion decision, Roe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
" Sometimes, headline writers exaggerate, and write sensational titles to draw people in. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm by Josh Blackman
[The Court is badly fractured, as Justice Barrett writes her first separate writing. ] Around 10:45 PM ET on Friday evening, the Supreme Court decided South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:49 am by Andrew Koppelman
Supreme Court Justice Alito’s recently leaked draft opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Barrett (2012) 54 Cal.4th 1081, 1114-1151, and the worst opinion was Justice Kennard's opinion In re Richards (2012) 55 Cal.4th 948, with People v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:31 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
By Martin Guggenheim Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s remarks during the Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
The court says knowledge is irrelevant to Section 230 (cites to Barrett and Jones v. [read post]