Search for: "Barrett v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
So, for example, Justice Barrett’s lovely opinion for the unanimous Court in Lindke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:39 am
Labrador v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Unlike Dobbs v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules public officials can be sued for blocking users on social media in some cases
16 Mar 2024, 11:28 am
In one, Lindke v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The decision in Murray v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
A new (albeit unpublished and uncitable) case, Piran v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]