Search for: "Barrett v. U.s.*"
Results 81 - 100
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In all likelihood, additional conservatives on today's Court also would have broken from Scalia in that case.I also tend to think that Justice Scalia would not have joined Justice Barrett's four-Justice Nance v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm
The US Supreme Court Tuesday heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:58 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion in Hollyfrontier Cheyenne Refining v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:12 am
In Does v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 8:10 am
§ 230(c)(1); Barrett v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:48 am
(These cases, including Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:21 am
See District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
Martinez wielded the court’s pre-Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
” Barrett v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
Justice Barrett may even grant a courtesy fifth. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Klein v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:20 am
Luxshare, Ltd. and AlixPartners, LLP v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:26 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Ciminelli v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
Barrett, 903 F.3d 166. [read post]
30 May 2015, 9:47 am
Represented by attorneys Amanda Farahany, Benjamin Barrett and Ben Stark, from Barrett & Farahany, LLP in Atlanta, they argued that the tests violated GINA. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]