Search for: "Bartels v. Bartels"
Results 81 - 100
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2017, 6:25 am
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:56 pm
Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – On March 21, 2024, Defendant Bartel filed a response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause addressing whether he should be sanctioned for repetitive and baseless motions. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
Radic v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:17 am
Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – Several of Defendant Bartel’s recent motions were stricken by the Court on June 6, 2023. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:47 am
Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – On April 27, 2023, Defendant Bartel filed a Motion to Add Evidence Regarding the True and Factual ‘Known Place of Business’ of Plaintiff. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 6:20 am
Defendant Bartel filed an Answer to Amended Complaint on August 15, 2023. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:37 am
Bartell Indus., 299 F.3d 1336, 1354 (Fed. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 7:30 am
Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – Defendant Bartel filed an Amended Answer to Amended Complaint on September 13, 2023. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 6:16 am
View this document on Scribd Defendant Bartel filed an Answer on September 9, 2022. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:22 pm
Bartell Industries, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
(Defs.' SUMF ¶¶ 113–117, 119–122, 128–129, 134) Wade Bartels, Ed. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:14 pm
Bartell Indus., Inc., 299 F.3d 1336, 1354 (Fed. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:59 pm
Bartell Indus., Inc., 299 F.3d 1336 (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:48 pm
Bartell Indus., Inc., 299 F.3d 1336, 1346 (Fed. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
In her report on American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:01 am
Bartell, 439 F.3d 346, 348 (7th Cir. 2006); Motorola Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
