Search for: "Barton v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court case involving a statutory immigration provision has the potential for implications far beyond the narrow issue in the case”; she argues that “[t]he Supreme Court’s most recent statutory interpretation case, Barton v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm by Glenn
Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Joe Barton (R-Texas) want information on Facebook courting kids http://t.co/JNXEnPLe 17:30:06, 2012-07-16 U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
Defendant: OXFORD BUILDING SERVICES, INC. and   ALLIED BARTON SECUIRTY SERVICES, LLC. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Brake and another v Chedington Court Estate Ltd, heard 1st November 2022 Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn–Jones, heard 3rd November 2022. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
Barton, 15-580, which involves a tricky issue of determining whether a state court ruled on a procedural or substantive basis and the types of review applicable to each. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am by Rob Jordan
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Appeal, Jay Willis calls Barton v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]