Search for: "Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" Results 201 - 220 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
. - Florida attorney Santiago Cueto of Cueto Law Group on his blog International Business Law Advisor No, You Cannot Make $60,000 a Year Just By Buying a Work From Home "Profit System" Kit - Brandon Brouillette of Khorrami Pollard & Abir on the firm's blog, Consumer Advocate Legal Update New Ruling Finds Important Protection For Managers Of Insolvent Delaware LLCs - San Francisco lawyer Bob Eisenbach of Cooley Godward at the firm's In The (Red) Business… [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm
” That part of the Circuit Court decision, his lawyers have said in court papers, raised a question that the Supreme Court had left open in 1988 (Basic Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Here is the abstract: At least since Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007), the district court turned first to the duty to disclose and noted that for purposes of Section 10(b) “‘[s]ilence, absent a duty to disclose, is not misleading,’ Basic Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
The district court held that under Rule 23(b), the requirement that all class members prove reliance may be presumed under the fraud-on-the-market doctrine of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:21 pm
At any rate, assuming the existence of a duty to disclose, both the general standard for materiality and the specialized probability/magnitude balancing under Basic v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
Sept. 30, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the fraud-on-the-market doctrine established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
Sept. 30, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the fraud-on-the-market doctrine established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:41 pm
"Twenty years ago, the Supreme Court held in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 am
Michigan lawprof Adam Pritchard, in the NLJ, argues that the Supreme Court went astray in its 1988 adoption of the "fraud on the market" theory, and proposes a perhaps unexpected workaround: ...Shareholders effectively take a dollar from one pocket, pay... [read post]