Search for: "Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" Results 141 - 160 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
John Fund, the Court rejected Halliburton’s request that it reverse its decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
Nardini Judge Nardini, writing for a unanimous Second Circuit panel (including Judges Jacobs and Raggi), began with the basics. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:33 am by admin
In coming to this conclusion, the court found that other, “contextual” factors lent support to the reports and that therefore (as stated in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by John Jascob
In fact, he added, the SEC has specifically acknowledged that this approach is not governed by the Basic v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:41 am by Kara OBrien
Mar. 22, 2011). a) Reaffirming the “total mix” of information standard for materiality set forth in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:15 am by Ronald Mann
The Supreme Court has an answer for that: Its 1988 decision in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm by Richard Booth
 The question arises because under the fraud-on-the-market (FOTM) theory, adopted by the Court in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
John Fund, Inc. 13-317Issue: (1) Whether this Court should overrule or substantially modify the holding of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
 The ruling put a solid new foundation under the Court’s 1988 ruling in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:06 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Granted, a footnote in the Supreme Court’s Basic v, Levinson opinion flatly stated that “trading and profit making by insiders can serve as an indication of materiality. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
The Supreme Court ruled in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:35 am by Andrew Trask
 In its second review of the Halliburton case, the Supreme Court upheld the “fraud on the market” presumption of Basic, Inc. v. [read post]