Search for: "Bass v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm by Marie Louise
: Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (PatLit)   South Africa Protecting image rights (IP finance)   South Sudan South Sudan: no IP change yet (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat) finds Select exclusive licensee of patent but patent invalid and not infringed: Select v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:28 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
”  In re Bass, 113 S.W.3d 735, 743 (Tex. 2003) (orig. proceeding) (citing Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
The Full Court has found: claims 1 and 5 of Australian Innovation Patent No 2006100980, in the name of Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd (‘SI’) (the ‘first innovation patent’) to be infringed by Richard Bass Pty Ltd (‘Bass’); and all claims of Australian Innovation Patent No 2008100126 to be valid (and also infringed by Bass). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:56 am by By Erik Lundegaard
Helping to propel her career have been a number of landmark cases, including Thompson v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
Sir Robin concluded his speech by criticizing the L'Oreal v Bellure decision (the AmeriKat agrees) and that this was an unfortunate development in trade mark law in Europe. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Should Australia have a specialist “freedom of speech” appellate court at Federal level, as is the case the United States? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by WIMS
When I took office, the country faced years of litigation and confusion because of conflicting rules set by Congress, federal regulators and states [See WIMS 5/19/09]. [read post]