Search for: "Bates v. United States Post Office"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am
United States… , it would not only open the door to far more military officers serving simultaneously in senior civilian positions, but it would fly in the face of what the Court has previously described as ‘the traditional and strong resistance of Americans to any military intrusion into civilian affairs. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 8:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
Since the 1970's when the Supreme Court of the United States decided that lawyers could advertise (Bates v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
It sounds as if there were some middle men that the CDC contracted with to get these substances from a foreign country into the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
United States District Court, D. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:12 pm
Paragraph 5 of the explanatory notes to that document states that: “The date and description of Notices are requested for office purposes only and will not be entered on the register”. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 8:00 pm
In proceedings before a board composed of military officers, detainees will have the right to call witnesses and present evidence when it is ‘reasonably available’…The boards will determine whether detainees should be held by the United States, turned over to Afghan authorities or released. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the case, which will be argued on Wednesday, “could go a long way toward reversing abortion rights in the United States[:] Whether they ultimately revert by four years or 47 remains to be seen. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
The conclusion that the President of the United States took part in a criminal conspiracy became inescapable. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” In an op-ed for Bloomberg, Joe Nocera argues that this week’s decision in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
We put up an initial post about Bausch v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
United States as permitting “Congress to inquire into and publicize corruption, maladministration or inefficiency in agencies of the Government. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
For example, it was not entirely clear whether the Constitution prohibited a state from allowing its law enforcement officers to shoot fleeing felons on sight until the Supreme Court’s decision in Tennessee v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 6:20 am
In Judge Bates’ ruling on April 2 (see this post), he concluded that the Supreme Court’s decision last June in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
(Will Baude) Yesterday I posted the amicus brief that I and a group of constitutional law scholars filed in the Court’s recess appointments case, Noel Canning. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
See in this regard our 2003 posting at Attorney Advertising in the USA and the Bates Case and our 2004 posting at Money to Burn - Judge Zagel, Robins et al., M. [read post]
