Search for: "Batson v. Kentucky"
Results 181 - 200
of 342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:41 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Batson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
Kentucky. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
Kentucky. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
Kentucky, a 1986 case that established the test defendants must use when challenging prosecutors’ racial motivations during jury selection. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:42 am
Paris than female jurors will be.The Supreme Court in Batson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 3:10 pm
The rule against discrimination stems from Batson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 11:17 am
Kentucky. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:46 am
Supreme Court’s 1986 Batson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Kentucky, 476 U. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:54 pm
Kentucky. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
The Court first finds that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:20 am
Under Batson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:59 pm
See, e.g., Batson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Kentucky. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Kentucky. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm
The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed again, this time because of a violation of Batson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 9:08 am
Kentucky. [read post]
