Search for: "Batson v. Mitchell"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
In Kansas v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
Mitchell, COA23-270, ___ N.C. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
Mitchell Roob, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Batson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
Mitchell, 2010 U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:31 pm
Michael Mitchell, No. 99,163 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal (petition for review); Aggravated robberyRyan J. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 8:58 pm
Mitchell, Sixth Circuit. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
” William Gerald Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
This case was a hard-fought battle by Deputy Federal Public Defenders Gia Kim and Jonathan Aminoff of the Central District of California.]Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
The back-story is too long and convoluted to reproduce here, but involves Illinois’ Paul Mitchell hairbrush-loving former governor Rod Blagojevich. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Branker, No. 07-8 Denial of habeas petition challenging convictions for the murder of a state trooper and a deputy sheriff is affirmed where: 1) the Supreme Court of North Carolina did not unreasonably apply the clearly established federal law of Batson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Mitchell’s SVP order under CR 60(b) that had denied him a full evidentiary hearing. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Louisiana, 128 S.Ct. 1203 (2008), petitioner is entitled to a COA in connection with his Batson claims in respect to two potential jurors. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
A denial of habeas relief on guilt phase claims is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) a failure to preserve voir dire transcripts; 2) a Batson claim; 3) whether a confession was involuntary and the product of an unconstitutional waiver; 4) ineffective assistance of counsel; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; and 6) cumulative error. [read post]
