Search for: "Battle v. Merck "
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Both courts pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 1:42 pm
Merck & Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
After having developed modern secure battlefield communications systems, Russian military personnel were unable to deploy them during their forces’ battle to capture Kyiv. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:25 am
Supreme Court made a ruling on the federal preemption legal issue in these Fosamax cases in May 2019 (see Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 2:28 pm
This legal battle is far from over. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:19 pm
In this case growing out of underlying German Merck v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
In 1920, the Spanish flu was raging its final battle against the world. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
The case, Lanard Toys Limited v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Their argument cited ongoing litigation in Mondelez International, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
Complete the look: Ralph Lauren Polo sweaterKat friend Just Wang analyses another Singaporean opposition trade mark case, in which passing off was relied on as the single (and successful) ground of opposition: When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark.In the conclusion of another trade mark battle, Mr Justice Arnold has handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155: BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
".Never Too Late 178 [week ending 14 January] A Merck-y appeal is remitted to the High Court | Into fashion law? [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:41 am
".Never Too Late 178 [week ending 14 January] A Merck-y appeal is remitted to the High Court | Into fashion law? [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too Late 178 [week ending 14 January] A Merck-y appeal is remitted to the High Court | Into fashion law? [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Edition 178 of Never Too Late is here to recap last week’s highlights here on the IPKat (week ending 14th January)A Merck-y appeal is remitted to the High CourtThe longstanding dispute relating to various issues over the use of the MERCK trade mark is set to continue The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has remitted Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 case back to the High Court. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
This work will encompass multiple research projects with the current proposals looking at: the role of price differentials, sector specific impacts and enforcement impacts.BREAKING: CJEU holds that SPCs cannot be obtained on the basis of an "end of procedure notice" pursuant to Article 3(b) SPC RegulationMr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
Mermeren v Fox. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
On the eve of the agreement of the European Commission Communication on SEP licensing, the AmeriKat sums up the situation for us in Who is going to win the big EU Commission SEP licensing battle - "use-based" or "licence to all"? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
UK Supreme Court moves towards a UK Doctrine of Equivalents in Lilly pemetrexed battle. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
Andrew considered that Regeneron v Kymab [2016] EWHC 87 (Pat) represented the most technically difficult decision of the year, although he noted that Electromagnetic Geoservices v PGS would have run it pretty close had the case not settled. [read post]
