Search for: "Battles v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2017, 5:51 am
More Blog Entries: Social Security Disability Appeal Successful, Feb. 18, 2017, Boston SSDI Lawyer Blog The post Social Security Disability Appellants Fight Uphill Battle appeared first on Massachusetts Social Security Disability Lawyers Blog. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:53 am
Astrue, the District Court for the Middle District of Florida reviews a battle of medical opinions, explaining that the ultimate decision as to whether a claimant is disabled for Social Security benefits purposes is for the Social Security Administration (SSA), not a medical expert, to decide. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
This is true whether you are applying for Social Security Disability Insurance in Massachusetts or Supplemental Security Income. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
Attorney Richard Culbertson successfully represented several Social Security disability claimants both before the Social Security Administration and in federal court. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
In the mid 1960s, as the agency became embroiled in battles over school desegregation, administrators deftly recharacterized their constitutional interpretation as a statutory one. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
She fought long and hard for her rights and then placed her future in the hands of this firm to do battle with the Social Security Administration on her behalf. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Berryhill: Whether the Social Security Administration can deny benefits when a vocational expert testifies that “other work” does exist, but declines to disclose the data on which the expert’s testimony rests. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
Cal. 2010), the court held that evidence of an award of Social Security disability benefits was necessary for an adequate de novo review of the plan administrator’s determination, where the Social Security decision was rendered six months after the denial of the claimant’s final administrative appeal in the ERISA matter. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
In the late 1930s, when federal courts appeared reluctant to vindicate equal protection claims, the federal Social Security Board (later to become part of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare) took a more active role via its administration of federal grants for state-run public welfare programs. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:15 am
District Court Judge Mark Kravitz on the topic of medical expert testimony by telephone at a Social Security disability hearing. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:45 am
Social Security Administration In Justiniano v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
Most of the federal ALJs sit on Social Security Administration cases (over 1,650 out of 1,926), for which it is much less likely that appointments clause objections were preserved, but given the number of cases they have, even a relative few will be bad news for the agency. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:57 am
In ACAP Financial v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:34 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) defines past relevant work as “work that you have done within the past 15 years, that was substantial gainful activity, and that lasted long enough for you to learn to do it. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
At a more technical level, the battle is over the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate, and the Trump administration’s efforts to expand the ability of employers to avoid it. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
S.4878 / H.R.8859 - A bill to amend title VI of the Social Security Act to improve the Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund, and for other purposes. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:41 pm
" The President went on to answer tough questions regarding the budget and the long-term deficit including Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, accumulated debt and defense spending. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:32 pm
Zubik v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Doe to inform school administrators that the practices violated federal law. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
