Search for: "Baus v. Baus"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Schneider v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:27 am
Inhaltliche Änderungen in der VOB/A 2019 betreffen v. a. den Abschnitt 1. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 3:19 am
VK Sachsen-Anhalt, Beschl. v. 21. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:49 pm
Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development ("CREED") v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:22 am
Maður er sko aldeilis farin að spjalla - ætla að skella inn svona þvà sem ég man à bili sem að ég kann að segja MEIJA = Meira dekka = Drekka Sita = sita mat = mat jóga = jógúrt dús = djús kes = kex Ãþss = Ãs bauð =… [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:36 am
Strong, Ambiente Ufficio SpA and others v Argentine Republic: Heir of Abaclat? [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:20 pm
(Citizens Climate Lobby v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 8:11 am
Jurame - Juan Bau 16. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:54 pm
The decision, Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
Tsakopoulos Investments, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:46 am
This has now been given, last Friday, by Mr Justice Floyd (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in Land Securities plc, Capital Shopping Centres plc and Hammerson plc v Registrar of Trade Marks [2008] EWHC 1744 (Pat).This was a decision in respect of three joined cases, which were heard together in order to determine the question of whether the operator of a shopping centre could register a trade mark for the services it might provide (White Rose, Victoria Centre and Eden Quarter being the… [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 4:18 am
S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 6:31 am
M, Beschl. v. 15. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
However, the CJEU disagreed with the GC's conclusion that the absence of such a statement would preclude any association between those shops and the goods of the mark applied for.First, the CJEU emphasised that the line of authority derived from Praktiker concerned only applications for registration as TMs and did not concern protection of trade marks registered at the time of the Praktiker judgment (EUIPO v Cactus, C-501/15 P). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Tomlinson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
The Supreme Court, in Tomlinson v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 3:26 pm
Svo bauðst ég til að hjálpa öllum hinum með sÃna pakka og passaði á að allar gjafir væru FULLOPNAÃAR, þ.e. ekki bara geymdar à kössum eða einhverju álÃka. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Let the names begin (Intellectual Property Watch) EPO, JPO, USPTO, SIPO and KIPO agree on work sharing initiative (IAM) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPR-Helpdesk) Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants future work to include global policy challenges (Intellectual Property Watch) End of life for IP (Securing Innovation) Royalty monetization: high-profile deals generate excitement among TTOs (Technology Transfer Tactics) Indentifying valuable… [read post]
