Search for: "Baxter v. Lang" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
At the time of the IPR filings Apotex was involved in litigation while Ranbaxy was not although the patents had been asserted against others, see IPRs 2013-00012 (Apotex v Alcon), 00015 (Apotex v Alcon), and 00024 (Ranbaxy v Vertex). [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
First up, on September 11th, Strafford Legal offers the webinar Post Grant Proceedings and Pending Litigation: Impact of Fresenius v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
 Pix Credit hereI wanted to take this opportunity to circulate a discussion draft of an essay, entitled "Legal Semiotics, Globalization and Governance. [read post]