Search for: "Baxter v. State of Indiana" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 965 S.W.2d 656, 662 (Tex. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6887, Baxter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 984 F.2d 71, 75-76 (2d Cir. 1993); Lindsay v. [read post]