Search for: "Baxter v. State of Maine"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 10:07 am
The California Supreme Court this morning issued its decision in Harris v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Hearing Impairments Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Governor Baxter School for the Deaf Mackworth Island Falmouth, ME 04105 Phone: (207) 781-6215 (Newborn to age 5); (207) 781-6244 (Grades K - 12) Programs for Children and Youth who are Blind or Visually Impaired or Deaf-Blind Division for the Blind and Visually Impaired 150 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0150 Phone: (207) 624-5959 Maine Center on Deafness, MCD 68 Bishop… [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
Justices Baxter and Corrigan were both recused. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
La. 1988), aff'd, 864 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1988).Maine: Porter v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:27 am
Chang v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Petitioner stated that, going back to Weaver v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:17 pm
Basel V. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
June 17, 1999).Maine: Violette v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:44 am
President Abraham Lincoln issued “General Orders No. 100: Instructions for the Government of the Armies of the United States in the Field,” commonly known as the “Lieber Code” after its main author Francis (Franz) Lieber. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm
Interestingly, the Supreme Court of the United States seems poised to reach the same result in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
In Larbie v Larbie, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3089773 (C.A.5 (Tex.) [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 81 Cal. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:07 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in Baxter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 235 F.3d 1307, 1317 (11th Cir. 2000) (“reaffirming” prior decision concerning warnings and punitive damages); Richards v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
