Search for: "Baxter v. Strickland"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2009, 5:07 am
The court believes that had the facts and analysis that have now been presented by Baxter’s tax expert, who was retained by her new counsel after her sentencing, been presented to the court prior to Baxter’s 2006 sentencing, the court would have imposed a lower sentence For the full opinion see Baxter v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Baxter v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
Duncan, Lafler and Frye: Strickland Revitalized? [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
Baxter International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
(relisted after the May 21 conference) Baxter v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Maryland, and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that Wearry’s attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 (1975), and Pierson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
