Search for: "Bays v. United States of America" Results 1 - 20 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am by Aditya
The Indian Newspapers report (Sunday TOI, p. 12) of the Obama Administration in the United States of America now doing away with the phrase ‘enemy combatant’; a designation for terror suspects to justify their detention in Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 295 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific to the claimant and essential to his defence to serious charges which might carry the death penalty, in confidence to… [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am by Aditya
The Indian Newspapers report (Sunday TOI, p. 12) of the Obama Administration in the United States of America now doing away with the phrase ‘enemy combatant’; a designation for terror suspects to justify their detention in Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am by Aditya
The Indian Newspapers report (Sunday TOI, p. 12) of the Obama Administration in the United States of America now doing away with the phrase ‘enemy combatant’; a designation for terror suspects to justify their detention in Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am by Judge Alan F. Pendleton (Retired)
This is the 2nd post of a 45 post United States Supreme Court Series designed to provide short educational summaries of the 45 most significant Supreme Court decisions ever issued. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm by Unknown
Chase blog and CRS report.Related posts:- Thematic Focus: Work/Economic Aspects - Pt. 2 (US) (26 June 2020)- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (24 June 2020)- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 2 (24 June 2020) [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Plaintiff has been raising crops and livestock for the past 23 years on land located in the territory ceded to the United States of America via the 1842 Treaty between the United States and the Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, 7 Stat. 591 (the 1842 Treaty). [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:45 am by Unknown
Dept. of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Jan. 2021) [text via ReliefWeb] Roadmap to Recovery: A Path Forward after the Remain in Mexico Program - Executive Summary (HIAS, Jan. 2021) [text] The State of the Immigration Courts: Trump Leaves Biden 1.3 Million Case Backlog in Immigration Courts (TRAC, Jan. 2021) [text] Journal articles: "The Asylum Search: How the Supreme Court's… [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:29 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction in the matter of East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm
  /ppnbsp;/ppIt is worth noting that some detainees' lawyers successfully argued their causes in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Although the Green Bay Packers have been called the worst stock in America from a shareholder perspective, it looks like the Carlyle Group is going to take a run at the title. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  On June 14, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals decided the question in United States of America v. 32.42 Acres of Land, No. 10-56568, D.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:42 am
Solicitor General Robert Bork in the Second Circuit to overturn racketeering and fraud convictions in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
United States of America v Tuggle – did establishing three CCTV cameras, encircling a man’s house for 18 months violate his privacy rights per the Fourth Amendment? [read post]