Search for: "Bear Stops v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 1,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by James Eckert
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am by SHG
The balance of the query is brought to bear, like “when did you stop beating your wife? [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:06 am by David Markus
Leon’s 46-page ruling in United States District Court in Washington reopens the district’s long fight over how much room the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to bear arms leaves for local regulation — and whether it applies only to firearms in the home, or to guns carried outside as well.The law gave the police the discretion to grant concealed-carry licenses only to those with “good reason to fear injury” or other specific… [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In addition, on 4 May 2007, the Tennessee Attorney General requested an execution date for Daryl Holton, a former soldier with a history of depression, who has effectively waived his appeals and has been found competent to do so.The execution of another "volunteer", Carey Dean Moore, due to be carried out in Nebraska on 8 May 2007, was stopped by the state Supreme Court on 2 May in view of concerns - not raised by Moore - about Nebraska's use of the electric chair. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:15 pm
In another instance, two individuals stopped for speeding identified themselves as “DREAMers,” immigrants who have grown up in the United States without documentation and consider this country their home. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
She was stopped by police while passing through immigration control. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
May 7, 2008) (holding that the parties’ custody agreement that stated that after returning to Colombia the child could move to the United States if he so desired was insufficient to establish the petitioner consented to retention of the child in the United States). [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution.... ... [read post]