Search for: "Beard v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
In state court, in the state of Washington (Spokane). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:36 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Holt is an example of this trend: 50 years ago there were likely no observant Muslim inmates in the State of Arkansas, so the question of Muslim inmates’ beards simply did not arise. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
Citing the Court’s recent decision in Beard v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:45 pm
LEXIS 83814 (CD CA, Sept. 15, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge held that a Sikh prisoner who was denied an exemption from beard length restrictions had not stated a claim under the First Amendment, but had stated a claim under RLUIPA. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:20 am
LEXIS 53236 (D AZ, May 6, 2010), an Arizona federal district court concluded that an inmate failed to state a free exercise claim in his complaint that food items were missing from his trays.In Cosco v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
In Seymore v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 pm
In December, without any independent evidence that the men had engaged in hostilities against the United States, U.S. officials sent them to Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:34 am
It could be argued, as in the Onassis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Hobbs, holding that Arkansas prison officials cannot prohibit a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard, drew commentary from Dawinder Sidhu, who at Religion and Politics suggests that “[a] plausible claim can also be made that Holt foreshadows the end of affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Locomotive Engineers argument 12/8/2009 Beard v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Beard? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
Arnold v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Even more so as I sit here today, working from home, wearing a Captain American t-shirt and a quarantine beard. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
