Search for: "Beard v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Beard v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am
LEXIS 31607 (ND NY, March 8, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge concluded that challenges by a corrections officer to a Muslim inmate's right to wear a beard did not impose a substantial burden on the inmate's ability to practice his religion.In Williams v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:40 am
From Muhammad v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
United States, it's not clear whether modern true threats analysis also requires that the defendant intended their statement to be taken as a threat, or at least was reckless about its impact. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm
United States: Is throwing a fish overboard a violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was supposed to be about reforming financial institutions? [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:35 am
(For Exhibit A, see Burwell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
United States (1983), the Supreme Court rejected a university’s claim for a religious exemption from a federal rule that barred race discrimination by tax-exempt organizations. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:15 pm
From "The Presidents of the United States in Order of Hotness. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Hobbs, holding that Arkansas prison officials cannot prohibit a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard, drew commentary from Dawinder Sidhu, who at Religion and Politics suggests that “[a] plausible claim can also be made that Holt foreshadows the end of affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
United States (1879). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
” Five years ago today, the Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:17 pm
The full opinion in Holt v. [read post]
