Search for: "Beard v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 7:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
On June 21, 1989, a deeply divided United States Supreme Court upheld the rights of protesters to burn the American flag in a landmark First Amendment decision. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
While others wore dark overcoats, reflecting the solemnity of the occasion, the representative of the United States, as Givhan colorfully described it, "was dressed in the kind of attire one typically wears to operate a snow blower. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that a Pennsylvania woman cannot be prosecuted in federal court for attempting to poison her husband’s mistress. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:07 am by Mary A. Fischer
” The favorable ruling by the United States Court of Appeals in September 2009 further buoyed their confidence. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 31607 (ND NY, March 8, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge concluded that challenges by a corrections officer to a Muslim inmate's right to wear a beard did not impose a substantial burden on the inmate's ability to practice his religion.In Williams v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am by Glen C. Hansen
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 12:45 am
Before the district court, Blockbuster asserted that CAFA had reversed the traditional rule that the party seeking removal to federal court bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction, citing a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Yeroushalmi v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:34 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
  Plaintiff did not obtain a registration for these videos before filing suit, because “Plaintiff is a foreign citizen and did not register all of his videos and photos in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
The First Circuit Court allowed the suit to proceed (Beard v. [read post]