Search for: "Beard v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am by Ken White
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
He was wanted by officials in the United Arab Emirates for a string of dodgy deals in Dubai. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am by David Oscar Markus
  Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:47 am by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, (3rd Cir., July 30, 2012), the 3rd Circuit affirmed a  Pennsylvania federal district court's opinion dismissing an inmate's complaint that he was denied access to plants, herbs, crystals, tarot cards, runes, spices, and an altar cloth in his cell to practice his Wiccan religion, and that he was not permitted to grow his hair or beard and was denied a religious adviser.In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by David Kopel
L. 294 (2000) (cited in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]