Search for: "Bedford v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Defendant stated that the discovery he sought was relevant to the issue whether plaintiff's actions caused appreciation to the separate property which should then be included in the marital estate. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am by gmlevine
United Business Machines, Inc., D2001-0577 (WIPO June 6, 2001); Government of Canada v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
[and,][t]o the contrary, the textbooks introduced as evidence purport, on their face, to have been published outside of the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:44 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, issued an opinion on June 29, 2011, in the case styled, Cheryl Likens v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The opinion in this case was issued on May 16, 2011, by the United States District Court, S. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion on April 11, 2011, where part of the case dealt with the requirements of an EUO. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:18 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, issued an opinion on March 18, 2011, styled, Brenda LeMeilleur v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 6:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, had a case recently dealing, in part, with this issue. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 9:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
ACREM, INC. d/b/a Stetsons Nightclub, and was decided by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 12:16 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, on December 23, 2010. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:09 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided on January 7, 2011, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:01 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is a case where the opinion was issued on January 7, 2011, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 10:27 pm by Michael DelSignore
Summer, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), decided by the United States Supreme Court the court addressed the issue of when an individual can be seized prior to executing a search warrant. [read post]