Search for: "Been v. Jolly" Results 1 - 20 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am by CodeX
The significance of this technological disruption has been made clear through Chief Justice John Roberts’s Annual Report[6] at the end of 2023. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:49 am by Hayleigh Bosher
The Chinese supreme court’s judgment on its FRAND jurisdiction has already been felt in the UK: Nokia v OPPO [2021] EWHC 2952 (Pat). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:15 am by SHG
” And then there’s New York v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
” Thailand Thailand’s pro-democracy groups have been holding gatherings to press for the abolition of a law tha [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am by SHG
Granted, a “statement” in a cert denial is a free opportunity to get one’s jollies out, much like a dissent in a 7-2 decision. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:25 am
[One might presume to interpret the tone of this declaration (at para 66) as jolly good British eyebrow raise!] [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]