Search for: "Been v. Jolly"
Results 61 - 80
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 1:06 am
Accordingly Erol's failure to serve a response pack could probably have been a good reason to set aside the default judgment.* there was some documentary evidence, including an email from Erol to his solicitors on 9 June which implied that there were indeed some ongoing discussions between the parties. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:36 pm
Jolly's priors include battery, assault with a deadly weapon, and burglary. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 8:06 am
Viechnicki, former Director of Sales for the Plaintiff, had been enjoined from competing with his former employer in some respects via a TRO (granted in Cumberland County Superior Court), which was continued into a Preliminary Injunction (by the Business Court, by Judge Jolly). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
CARL V. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
This leads Merpel to speculate as to what might have been the outcome, had the same set of facts occurred in the European Patent Office. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:15 am
When I wrote last week about Americana Development, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:02 pm
In an Order entered last week in Americana Development, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 1:00 pm
That bad old billionaire racist Donald Sterling had fallen out of the news, and here's V. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
Thomas v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:16 am
The decision by Judge Bledsoe last week in 130 of Chatham, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:14 am
The district court erred by not granting the nursing home’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (Nobach v Woodland Village Nursing Center, Inc, August 7, 2014, Jolly, E). [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
Gaines v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:18 am
The Plaintiff in Ehrenhaus v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
Let's have the Press Office of the Episcopal Diocese tell us what happened on Day 7 of the trial, with ECUSA and ECSC putting on their portion of the case (I have added some explanatory notes, taken from my daily postings on the trial over at StandFirm):DAY SEVEN: DIOCESE OF SC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:45 am
¶30 (quoting Bendet v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:02 am
” In approving the use of a fine against Berry, the Court of Appeals quoted several earlier appellate opinions — Jolly v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:46 am
It's Krieger v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
Because there's a question you may have been wondering about:How is it that Amy knew Paroline had her stuff on his computer? [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Cooper v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:42 am
It must have been a fun event, what with 300 people gathered together for some 35 countries for the purpose of celebrating achievements in IP law and practice. [read post]
