Search for: "Been v. Jolly"
Results 81 - 100
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
Many of the lawyer’s far-fetched proposals have been rejected by federal regulators. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
This had been inaccurate in certain respects but it was held that sufficient remedial action had been taken. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:12 am
Judge Jolly didn't buy that. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 9:38 pm
Cute if unkind, but it's worth reflecting on when we consider Mandela v., oh well, almost anybody else in Africa. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It happened again last week, in Wallace v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
And one cannot help wonder, thinking about L'Oréal v Bellure, how many average consumers' economic behaviour would have been altered by the knowledge that they were faced with a smell-alike version of the real upmarket scent. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In Jolly v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:26 pm
Open source v proprietary software". [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
In that case, it hinted that the outcome might have been different. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:12 pm
Murder v. subsidence? [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:27 pm
It's hard to conceive of a more unlikely Business Court case than Keister v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
Whitley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:33 am
At trial, it would be able to call evidence in support of its case, including further evidence to the effect that British Asians had been confused by Zeebox's branding. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:33 am
Judge Jolly was not buying any of that. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:52 am
Those are probably unlikely to come up in a business litigation practice, but Judge Jolly's Order last week in Meir v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:32 pm
Cat's Paw Decision Not Very Employer Friendly.)Although the result might have been the same regardless of Staub, that's not what it sounds like. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:28 am
There may well be some jolly good reasons why the whole episode took so long, but to the outsider everything seems, well, a little slow. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
What a busy month or so it has been for the IPKat. [read post]
