Search for: "Beene v. Henderson State University" Results 21 - 40 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Background After graduating with honors from Harvard University and Harvard Law School, D.C. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
The program for the annual meeting of the American Society for Legal History, to be held in Boston, November 21-24, 2019, has been announced. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved On Tuesday 27 April 201 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P,  Henderson and Warby LJJ) heard the appeal in case of Riley v Sivier. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Apologies for the overlapping text, which you can avoid by copying and pasting into a wordprocessin document.]The program for the annual meeting of the American Society for Legal History, to be held in Boston, November 21-24, 2019, has been announced. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:03 am by Gene Quinn
Stoll’s technical training is as an electrical engineer, with a degree from Michigan State University. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
Charlotte Garden is an associate professor at Seattle University School of Law. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 2:09 pm
  I have been teaching at the University of Nebraska College of Law since 2006. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Protocol 16 has been implemented by the ECHR as of 1 August 2018. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
  She begins her opinion, as judges usually do, explaining how the lawsuit arose and what it involved:Plaintiffs Phillip Beverly and Robert Bionaz are two professors at Chicago State University (`CSU’). [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the Court in Henderson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:25 am
It found that Jefferson had not been coerced into participating in religious-based rehabilitation programs; that forcing him to participate in non-Islamic based programs did not violate his free exercise rights; that his removal from his job as Chapel clerk was justified based on his inflammatory and disruptive poetry; and that he was offered access to the same programs and benefits as other prisoners.In Henderson v. [read post]