Search for: "Belk v. Belk" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am by Jeff Welty
Brawley, 306 N.C. 626 (2018) (discussed here, holding that “Belk’s Department Store” sufficiently described an entity capable of owning property, though it did not specify the nature of the entity), and the decision in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm by Jennifer E. Benda
  The Fifth Circuit’s held that the Tax Court’s reliance in Belk  v. [read post]